3 like 0 dislike
in Open Science by (2.8k points)

The research landscape is complex, and different actors have different options to help with a systemic move towards open science.

Research infrastructure providers

  • provide research infrastructure
  • interact with other infrastructure providers
  • interact with other research stakeholders
  • care about standards
  • do many other things

In this thread, I would like us to explore which options research infrastructure providers have to encourage open science in-house as well as in the communities and other stakeholders they interact with.

If you have multiple ideas for concrete actions, I suggest to post them as separate answers (rather than as one monolithic answer), so as to facilitate the discussion and refinement of your ideas.

4 Answers

2 like 0 dislike
by (2.8k points)
Work towards integrating with open science workflows, e.g. by way of APIs.
1 like 0 dislike
by (2.8k points)
edited by
  • Use open standards.
  • When you use and produce software, go for FLOSS whenever possible.
  • Use open licenses for content/ outreach/ other materials you produce.
  • Use open formats. If that is not fully possible, try ingesting non-open formats and convert them to open ones by default.



1 like 0 dislike
by (210 points)
They need to provide training program that educate the research how to use the infrastructure in an open manner.
1 like 0 dislike
by (2.8k points)
Make it easy to share workflows non-publicly, and to make non-public workflows public.

Ask Open Science used to be called Open Science Q&A but we changed the name when we registered the domain ask-open-science.org. Everything else stays the same: We are still hosted by Bielefeld University.

If you participated in the Open Science beta at StackExchange, please reclaim your user account now – it's already here!

E-mail the webmaster

Legal notice

Privacy statement